MI UIA Lawsuit Payout Date: Are You Getting Paid? Find Out

For thousands of Michiganders, the phrase 'unemployment benefits' conjures not relief, but a nightmare of wrongful accusations and financial hardship. If you were one of the many impacted by the Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency's (UIA) automated MiDAS system, leading to widespread false fraud claims, you're not alone—and justice may finally be within reach.

The ongoing MI UIA Class-Action Lawsuit is a landmark case offering potential relief and significant payouts to those who suffered. This comprehensive guide cuts through the complexity, providing the latest updates on the settlement status, clarifying crucial payout timelines, and detailing the eligibility criteria you need to know. We're here to empower you with the answers regarding your claim and the path to reclaiming what's rightfully yours.

Image taken from the YouTube channel WNEM TV5 , from the video titled Michiganders wrongfully accused of defrauding UIA can now sue state .

Navigating the complexities of unemployment benefits can be a daunting challenge, and for thousands of individuals in Michigan, this challenge has been compounded by an unprecedented legal battle.

Are You Among the Thousands Affected? Unraveling the MI UIA Lawsuit and Your Potential Payout

For countless Michigan residents who found themselves navigating the state's unemployment system during a period of unprecedented need, a distressing new hurdle emerged: false accusations of fraud. These errors, which brought immense stress and financial hardship, led to the formation of the Michigan UIA Class-Action Lawsuit. This ongoing legal battle represents a critical fight for justice and compensation for thousands of claimants who were unjustly penalized. It’s a landmark case aimed at rectifying the systemic failures that impacted so many lives, and its resolution carries significant implications for those who were wronged.

The Heart of the Matter: False Accusations and Automated Systems

The genesis of this significant lawsuit lies in a critical flaw within the Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency's (UIA) operations, specifically the widespread generation of false fraud accusations. These erroneous claims were largely triggered by the agency's automated computer system, known as MiDAS (Michigan Integrated Data Automated System). Designed to streamline unemployment benefit processing, MiDAS instead became the source of immense distress, flagging legitimate claimants for fraud without proper human oversight or due process. The system's failures led to thousands of individuals being wrongly accused, their benefits halted, and many even pursued for repayment, casting a long shadow of anxiety and uncertainty over their financial futures.

What This Guide Offers: Your Path to Clarity

We understand that for those affected, the journey through this complex legal process can feel overwhelming and isolating. It is with both empathy for your experience and a commitment to providing clear, reliable information that this section has been crafted. Our primary purpose is to serve as your authoritative guide through this intricate landscape.

Specifically, within this and subsequent sections, you will find:

• The Latest Updates on Settlement Status: We will provide the most current information regarding the progress of the class-action lawsuit, including any recent court decisions or movements towards a resolution.
• Clear Payout Timelines: As the case develops, we will clarify what is known about potential payout schedules, helping you understand when and how compensation might be distributed.
• Detailed Eligibility Criteria: Understanding whether you qualify as an affected individual and are therefore eligible for a payout is paramount. We will break down the criteria to help you assess your standing.

Our aim is to distill complex legal and administrative details into accessible, actionable insights, empowering you with the knowledge you need concerning your unemployment benefits and potential compensation. You deserve clarity and accurate information during this challenging time.

To truly comprehend the scale of this issue, it's essential to delve deeper into the very system that created these widespread inaccuracies.

While the prospect of a payout offers a glimmer of hope for many, understanding the profound injustice that necessitated this legal action is crucial.

When Technology Betrayed Trust: The MiDAS Debacle and False Accusations

The Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency (UIA) is designed to provide a vital safety net for workers in the State of Michigan who find themselves temporarily out of a job. However, for a period stretching from 2013 to 2017, this very system became a source of immense distress and financial ruin for thousands of claimants. At the heart of this crisis was an ambitious, yet fatally flawed, automated system: the Michigan Integrated Data Automated System, or MiDAS.

The Automated Architect of Accusations: MiDAS's Unintended Consequences

Introduced with the aim of modernizing and streamlining the unemployment claims process, MiDAS was designed to use sophisticated algorithms to detect potential fraud more efficiently. However, the system's reliance on automated flags and rigid rules, often without adequate human oversight or verification, quickly spiraled into a catastrophic flaw. Instead of merely identifying suspicious patterns for further investigation, MiDAS began generating false fraud accusations at an alarming rate. These were not merely errors in processing; they were definitive declarations of fraudulent activity leveled against unsuspecting individuals, often based on trivial discrepancies or misinterpreted data. The system operated on a presumption of guilt, treating automated flags as conclusive proof.

From False Accusations to Financial Ruin: The Impact on Claimants

The consequences of these erroneous false fraud accusations were immediate and devastating. When MiDAS flagged a claimant for fraud, it automatically triggered the wrongful denial of their unemployment benefits. This wasn't just a temporary delay; it often meant the complete cessation of their financial lifeline, plunging already vulnerable families into severe financial hardship.

Consider the human cost:

• Loss of Essential Income: Thousands of individuals, who had legitimately lost their jobs and relied on these benefits to cover basic necessities like rent, food, and utilities, suddenly found their income cut off.
• Exorbitant Penalties: Compounding the problem, the UIA often assessed a staggering 400% penalty on the alleged "overpaid" benefits. This meant claimants were not only denied their rightful benefits but were also ordered to repay four times the amount they supposedly owed, often for money they never received or for legitimate benefits they were entitled to.
• Mounting Debt and Stress: The combination of denied benefits and massive, unwarranted penalties led to foreclosures, bankruptcies, repossessions, and immense psychological distress for families across the State of Michigan. Many were forced to deplete life savings, borrow from relatives, or even face homelessness.

A Fundamental Breach: The Violation of Due Process Rights

The widespread generation of false fraud accusations by MiDAS revealed a deep and systemic violation of fundamental due process rights, which became the cornerstone of the Class-Action Lawsuit filed against the State of Michigan. Due process guarantees that individuals have the right to fair treatment under the law, including adequate notice of accusations against them and a meaningful opportunity to be heard and challenge those accusations before a neutral party.

In the case of MiDAS, these rights were consistently denied:

• Lack of Proper Notice: Claimants often received vague or confusing notices, or sometimes no proper notice at all, about the fraud accusations or their right to appeal.
• Presumption of Guilt: The system's automated nature effectively presumed guilt, placing the burden squarely on the claimant to prove their innocence against a faceless algorithm.
• Inadequate Appeal Process: While an appeal process existed, it was often overwhelmed, inefficient, and stacked against the claimants, making it incredibly difficult to overturn the automated fraud findings.

This systematic erosion of due process meant that ordinary citizens were stripped of their rightful benefits and branded as fraudsters without ever truly having their day in court or a fair chance to present their side.

The Scale of the Catastrophe: A State-Wide Problem

The problem was not isolated; it was a state-wide catastrophe. Thousands of claimants were impacted, leading to a profound loss of public trust in the UIA and the state government. The magnitude of the errors and the severity of the financial hardship imposed on innocent individuals underscored the urgent need for comprehensive legal action. The Class-Action Lawsuit was not merely about individual claims; it was about holding the State of Michigan accountable for a fundamental breakdown in its duty to protect its citizens' rights and provide a fair and just unemployment insurance system.

Here's a summary of the critical issues stemming from the MiDAS system that necessitated this legal action:

With a clear understanding of the systemic failures that plagued Michigan's unemployment system, attention now turns to the ongoing efforts to rectify these wrongs.

While the previous section illuminated the systemic flaws and the devastating impact of the MiDAS system's false fraud accusations, the focus now shifts from the genesis of the problem to the unfolding path toward resolution.

From Accusation to Acknowledgment: The UIA Settlement's Current Trajectory

For thousands of Michiganders unfairly labeled and financially impacted by the Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency's (UIA) automated fraud detection system, the protracted battle for justice has reached a critical juncture. The ongoing Michigan UIA Class-Action Lawsuit, Crosby v. Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency, represents a significant step towards rectifying past wrongs, and understanding its current settlement status is paramount for all affected claimants. This section delves into the latest developments, the purpose of the established Settlement Fund, and what this landmark agreement signifies for those seeking redress and the restoration of their due process rights.

Navigating the Path to Resolution: Updates on Settlement Negotiations and Judicial Approvals

The journey of a class-action lawsuit from filing to final resolution is often complex and lengthy, involving extensive negotiations and multiple stages of judicial review. For the Michigan UIA case, significant progress has been made, culminating in pivotal approvals that are steering the lawsuit towards its compensatory phase.

The core of the current status revolves around the Preliminary Approval of the settlement agreement, a crucial step where a court reviews the proposed settlement to determine if it appears fair, reasonable, and adequate to warrant further consideration by the class members. Following this, a period of Notice to the class members commenced, informing them of the settlement terms, their rights, and the process for objecting or opting out. The culmination of this phase is the Final Approval Hearing, where the court considers any objections and ultimately decides whether to grant final approval to the settlement, making it legally binding.

As of the latest updates, the settlement has progressed through the initial negotiation and preliminary approval phases, with the court having thoroughly reviewed the terms to ensure they adequately address the harms suffered by the affected class. This careful judicial oversight is essential to guarantee that the interests of all claimants are protected throughout the process.

The Settlement Fund: A Beacon for Compensation and Rectification

Central to the Crosby settlement is the establishment of a substantial Settlement Fund, meticulously designed to compensate affected claimants for the hardships endured due to the false fraud accusations and the subsequent unfair impact on their unemployment benefits. The purpose and scope of this fund are comprehensive:

• Reimbursement of Collections: A primary objective is to reimburse claimants for any monies previously collected by the UIA due to the erroneous fraud findings, including overpayment collections, penalties, and interest. This aims to restore financial stability to those who had their benefits recouped unjustly.
• Statutory Damages: The fund also accounts for potential statutory damages, acknowledging the legal harm caused by the agency's actions, beyond simple financial loss.
• Interest on Withheld Benefits: Compensation will also include interest on benefits that were improperly withheld or delayed as a direct result of the false accusations, recognizing the time value of money and the financial strain imposed.
• Restoring Due Process: Beyond monetary compensation, the fund facilitates the administrative process necessary to clear records, remove fraudulent designations, and ensure that claimants' rights to due process are unequivocally restored. This means correcting UIA records to reflect that no fraud occurred, preventing future negative impacts on their ability to claim benefits.

The size and allocation of the Settlement Fund underscore the gravity of the systemic errors and the commitment to providing meaningful restitution to those affected.

Key Milestones in the Settlement Approval Process

The table below outlines the critical stages of the settlement's journey through the judicial system and their current standing, providing a clear snapshot of its progression.

Note: Dates are illustrative and subject to the actual proceedings of the specific lawsuit.

A New Era of Due Process: What the Settlement Means for Claimants

For those who endured the traumatic experience of being falsely accused of fraud and having their vital unemployment benefits unfairly impacted, this settlement represents more than just financial compensation; it signifies a profound restoration of due process.

• Validation of Experience: The settlement is an official acknowledgment from the state that its system was flawed and that claimants were unjustly harmed. This validation can bring significant emotional relief after years of fighting bureaucratic hurdles and reputational damage.
• Financial Redress: Claimants who were subjected to erroneous overpayment collections, penalties, or had benefits unfairly withheld will now have a path to recover those funds, providing much-needed financial relief and stability.
• Clearing of Records: Beyond monetary compensation, a crucial aspect of the settlement is the mandate to correct UIA records, permanently removing the fraudulent designations. This ensures that the false accusations do not follow claimants into future interactions with the UIA or other government agencies.
• Accountability and Reform: The class action and its settlement also serve as a powerful catalyst for systemic reform within the UIA, pressuring the agency to implement more robust, claimant-centric processes to prevent similar injustices from occurring in the future.

In essence, the settlement aims to turn the page on a difficult chapter for thousands, not only by providing financial restitution but by affirming the fundamental right to fair treatment and due process, ensuring that the burden of proving innocence no longer falls solely on the individual.

With the settlement now moving through its final administrative phases, the natural next question for claimants is a practical one: when will the long-awaited funds actually arrive?

Having established a clear understanding of the Michigan UIA Class-Action Lawsuit's current settlement status and the groundwork laid for resolution, the most urgent question for claimants understandably shifts to the practical outcome: when will the funds arrive?

The Countdown to Compensation: Navigating Your Michigan UIA Settlement Payout

For countless claimants impacted by the Michigan UIA lawsuit, the anticipation of receiving their rightful settlement funds is profound. Understanding the process, potential timelines, and necessary steps is crucial for managing expectations and ensuring a smooth receipt of your much-awaited compensation.

Anticipating Your Funds: Payout Dates and Timelines

While the final payout date is the ultimate goal, it's important for claimants to understand that the distribution of a settlement fund of this magnitude is a complex, multi-stage process, not an instantaneous event. The anticipated timelines are contingent upon several factors, including the finality of legal proceedings, the sheer volume of eligible claimants, and the administrative capacity of the designated Settlement Administrator.

The primary goal is to distribute funds as efficiently and accurately as possible, but patience is a virtue given the scale of the operation. Specific dates will be communicated through official channels once they are firmly established and confirmed by the court and Settlement Administrator.

The Intricacies of Distribution: Navigating a Massive Undertaking

Distributing funds from the Settlement Fund to potentially hundreds of thousands of eligible claimants is an administrative challenge of considerable proportions. This process involves:

• Verification of Eligibility and Data Accuracy: Each claimant's eligibility must be re-verified against the court-approved criteria, and their contact and payment information meticulously checked for accuracy. Discrepancies can lead to delays.
• Data Processing at Scale: Managing and processing millions of data points, including claim IDs, personal details, and financial information, requires robust systems and significant manpower.
• Legal and Administrative Oversight: The entire distribution process operates under strict legal oversight to ensure fairness, transparency, and adherence to the settlement agreement. This includes handling potential objections or appeals related to individual claims.
• Fund Management: The Settlement Fund itself must be managed securely, ensuring that all funds are accounted for and disbursed correctly.

Receiving Your Share: Methods of Payment and Essential Steps

The Settlement Administrator will employ secure and efficient methods for distributing funds. Typically, claimants can expect payments via:

• Direct Deposit: This is generally the fastest and most secure method of receiving your settlement. Claimants who previously provided or are asked to provide their banking information (account number and routing number) should opt for this to expedite receipt.
• Physical Check: For claimants who do not provide direct deposit details or for whom direct deposit is not feasible, a physical check will be mailed to their address on file. This method can be slower due to mail delivery times and carries a slight risk of loss or delay in transit.

To facilitate the timely receipt of your settlement, claimants are strongly advised to take the following proactive steps:

1. Update Contact Information: Ensure that your mailing address, email address, and phone number are current with the Settlement Administrator. Any changes should be reported immediately through the official channels provided.
2. Verify Banking Details: If you intend to receive your payment via direct deposit, double-check that the banking information you have provided or will provide is absolutely accurate. Even a single incorrect digit can cause significant delays or misdirection of funds.
3. Monitor Official Communications: Regularly check the official settlement website, your email (including spam folders), and physical mail for updates, instructions, or requests for further information from the Settlement Administrator. These communications are critical and time-sensitive.
4. Be Wary of Scams: The Settlement Administrator will never ask for sensitive personal information (like your Social Security Number) over an unsolicited phone call or email, nor will they demand payment for processing your settlement. All official requests will come through secure, verified channels.
5. Retain Documentation: Keep copies of any claim forms, correspondence, or confirmation notices related to your settlement. This documentation can be vital if any issues arise.

Estimated Payout Timelines and Stages

While exact dates are subject to change, the distribution process for a large class-action settlement typically follows a series of stages, each with its own estimated duration. The table below illustrates a generalized timeline for different phases of the payout process:

This timeline is a broad estimate. The actual duration for each stage can vary depending on the total number of claimants, the responsiveness of individuals to information requests, and any unforeseen administrative hurdles.

As we look towards the next steps, understanding whether you meet the specific parameters of the settlement is paramount.

While understanding when your funds might arrive is crucial, the first step for many is determining if they are eligible to receive anything at all.

Decoding Eligibility: Is the MI UIA Settlement Fund Meant for You?

The Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency (UIA) class-action lawsuit settlement offers a critical opportunity for individuals who were unjustly impacted by the agency's past practices. This section aims to provide clear, authoritative guidance on the specific criteria that determine whether you are an affected claimant eligible for compensation from the Settlement Fund. It's designed to help you understand your potential standing and navigate the path toward receiving the justice you deserve.

Defining the Scope: Who is Covered?

The core of eligibility for the Michigan UIA Class-Action Lawsuit Settlement Fund revolves around individuals who suffered financial harm due to false fraud accusations or improper denials of unemployment benefits. The lawsuit specifically addresses issues where the UIA wrongfully accused claimants of fraud, pursued aggressive collection efforts based on those false accusations, or otherwise denied benefits through systemic errors, particularly during a specific timeframe.

To qualify, a claimant generally must have been affected by certain UIA practices that led to:

• False Fraud Accusations: You were wrongly flagged or accused of unemployment benefit fraud by the UIA, even if you did not intentionally misrepresent information.
• Improper Benefit Denials: Your unemployment benefits were denied or suspended due to systemic errors within the UIA's processes, rather than legitimate ineligibility.
• Collections Based on Error: The UIA pursued collection activities against you (e.g., wage garnishments, tax refund intercepts) based on these false fraud findings or improper denials.

Qualifying Scenarios: Understanding the Specifics

The lawsuit covers a range of scenarios where UIA's automated systems or processes led to incorrect determinations. It's not just about deliberate fraud; it often encompasses situations where claimants were caught in the crossfire of flawed algorithms or agency errors.

Here are the primary types of false fraud accusations or denials of unemployment benefits that qualify claimants for a payout:

• Automated Fraud Determinations (MiDAS System): Claimants who were incorrectly accused of fraud by the UIA's automated computer system, particularly the "MiDAS" system, between October 1, 2011, and August 31, 2015. Even if the fraud finding was later reversed or withdrawn, if it caused you undue hardship or led to collection efforts, you might qualify.
• Non-Fraud Related Denials Due to UIA Error: Claimants whose unemployment benefits were denied, delayed, or stopped due to systemic errors or inefficiencies on the part of the UIA, rather than a legitimate reason for disqualification. This could include issues like benefits stopped incorrectly, appeals not processed properly, or incorrect overpayment calculations.
• Collection Activities: If the UIA initiated collection actions against you (e.g., intercepts of tax refunds, wage garnishments, liens, or demands for repayment) based on a false fraud determination or an erroneous benefit denial, you are likely eligible.

To provide further clarity, the following table details common scenarios that often lead to eligibility:

Your Key to Compensation: The Claim Form

The Claim Form is your official gateway to seeking compensation from the Settlement Fund. Its importance cannot be overstated, as it is the primary document through which you assert your eligibility and provide the necessary details for your case to be reviewed.

How Claimants Can Verify Eligibility Status:

1. Review Official Communications: Pay close attention to any notices or communications you receive directly from the UIA or the Class Action Settlement Administrator. These documents will often indicate if you've been identified as a potential class member.
2. Consult the Settlement Website: An official website for the settlement has been established, which serves as a central hub for information. This site often includes a tool or a process for claimants to enter their identifying information (such as their Social Security Number or UIA Account Number) to check if they are part of the recognized class of affected individuals.
3. Contact the Settlement Administrator: If you are unsure or unable to verify your status online, reach out directly to the Settlement Administrator using the contact information provided in official notices or on the settlement website. They can guide you through the verification process.

Building Your Case: Necessary Documentation

While the Claim Form itself will gather essential information, claimants might need to provide supporting documentation or information to strengthen their claim and ensure accurate processing. The more comprehensive and clear your submission, the smoother the review process can be.

Common documentation or information claimants might need to provide includes:

• UIA Correspondence: Any letters, notices, or determinations you received from the UIA regarding your unemployment claim, especially those related to fraud accusations, overpayments, or benefit denials.
• Proof of Payments/Collections: Records of any payments you made to the UIA, evidence of wage garnishments, tax refund intercepts, or other collection activities initiated by the UIA based on erroneous findings.
• Court or Appeal Documents: If you appealed a UIA decision or had a court case related to your unemployment benefits, relevant legal documents can be crucial.
• Personal Records: While not always explicitly required, personal notes, financial records, or other documentation that helps to establish the timeline of events and the impact on you can be helpful.
• Identification: Standard identification information to verify your identity as the claimant.

It is crucial to be as accurate and thorough as possible when completing the Claim Form and gathering any requested documentation. This approach ensures your claim accurately reflects your experience and meets the settlement's criteria for compensation.

Understanding your eligibility is a significant step, and with this knowledge, claimants can now look forward to what comes next.

Having identified whether you are an affected claimant, the natural next step involves understanding the trajectory of the MI UIA Lawsuit and what it means for you.

Beyond Eligibility: Charting the Path to Resolution for MI UIA Claimants

As a claimant in the MI UIA Lawsuit, comprehending the various stages of this significant legal process is paramount. This section aims to provide a comprehensive overview, consolidating the critical information you need to stay informed and prepared for the road ahead.

The Foundation of Your Claim: A Quick Overview

To fully grasp the current landscape and future prospects, it’s beneficial to recap the pivotal elements that have brought us to this point.

The Genesis of the MiDAS Crisis

The MI UIA Lawsuit stems from a deeply flawed automated fraud detection system, known as MiDAS, which was implemented by the Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency (UIA). Between 2013 and 2015, this system erroneously flagged tens of thousands of Michiganders for false fraud accusations, leading to severe financial hardship, garnished wages, and damaged credit for many innocent individuals. This Class-Action Lawsuit was initiated to seek justice and rectify the immense harm caused by the UIA's overzealous and automated approach, which circumvented fundamental due process rights.

Current Settlement Status

The Class-Action Lawsuit has reached a significant milestone with a proposed settlement. This agreement aims to provide relief to those who were unjustly accused of fraud and subsequently penalized. While the exact details of the final settlement are subject to court approval and ongoing administrative processes, the current status reflects a commitment to compensating affected claimants and addressing the systemic issues that led to the errors.

Anticipating Payouts: Timelines Explained

Understanding the projected payout timelines is crucial for claimants. It is important to manage expectations, as class-action settlements often involve a multi-stage process, including final court approval, the establishment of claims administration, and the distribution of funds. While specific dates are fluid and subject to change based on judicial proceedings and administrative efficiency, claimants should anticipate a period of several months, and potentially longer, before distributions commence. Official updates from the Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency (UIA) or the court will provide the most accurate and up-to-date timelines.

Reaffirming Eligibility: Your Key Role

The discussion around eligibility criteria from the previous section remains critical. Your status as an affected claimant is the bedrock upon which your participation in this settlement rests. It is essential to ensure that you meet all specified criteria and are prepared to provide any required documentation to substantiate your claim when the official claims process is announced.

Vigilance is Key: Official Updates

In a case of this magnitude, information is power. It is paramount for claimants to remain informed and vigilant for official updates. Rely solely on communications directly from the Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency (UIA), the court, or the court-appointed claims administrator. Be wary of unofficial sources or unsolicited advice that may not be accurate. These official channels will provide crucial details regarding final settlement approval, claim submission deadlines, and payout schedules.

When to Consult Legal Counsel

While this guide provides general information, every individual's situation is unique. If you have specific questions about your individual case, believe your circumstances are complex, or require assistance in understanding or completing your claim form, it is strongly encouraged to seek legal advice. Consulting with an attorney specializing in class-action lawsuits or administrative law can provide personalized guidance and ensure your rights are fully protected throughout this process.

The Promise of Restored Justice

The MI UIA Lawsuit settlement represents more than just financial compensation; it signifies a pivotal step towards restoring due process and justice for the thousands of individuals whose lives were unfairly impacted by false fraud accusations stemming from the MiDAS system. This resolution is a testament to the power of collective action and the unwavering pursuit of fairness. While the journey has been long and challenging, this settlement offers a measure of reassurance and a path toward healing for those who endured significant hardship.

As the case progresses, comprehensive guidance on navigating the claims submission process will be made available.

Video: MI UIA Lawsuit Payout Date: Are You Getting Paid? Find Out

Play Video

Navigating the complexities of the Michigan UIA Class-Action Lawsuit can feel daunting, but understanding its origins in the flawed MiDAS system, tracking the current settlement status, anticipating payout timelines, and confirming your eligibility are crucial steps toward resolution. We've equipped you with the essential information to navigate this journey.

The path to justice, while long, is finally yielding results, offering a beacon of hope and financial recompense for thousands. We strongly urge you to remain vigilant for official updates from the Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency (UIA) or court-appointed channels. If your individual circumstances require specific guidance, do not hesitate to consult legal counsel to ensure your claim is fully recognized. This landmark settlement is more than just a payout; it's a critical step in restoring due process and delivering justice to those who unjustly suffered. Your perseverance is paying off.